Vol. 7, No. 1 / February 2009
5 strategies to improve contraceptive success for your patientsAnita
L.
Nelson,
MDProfessor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
Chief, Women’s Health, Care Programs, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
|
DISCLOSURE
DR NELSON reports that she receives grants/research support from Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. She is on the speakers bureau of/receives honoraria from Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Inc., Schering-Plough Corporation (Organon BioSciences), Ther-Rx Corporation, and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. She is a consultant/advisory board member of Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals.
|
Supported by an independent educational grant from Ortho Women’s Health and Urology and Schering-Plough.
Sponsored by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
Half of the annual population growth in the United States is due to unintended pregnancy.1 Underestimation of fertility and pregnancy risks, discontinuation and noncompliance with a birth control method, as well as misinformation about mechanisms of action and ambivalence about pregnancy all contribute to this high rate of unintended pregnancy.2,3
Planning a pregnancy can improve outcomes for the mother and child. Nevertheless, many women who do not want to become pregnant do not use birth control.2 When a pregnancy is planned, women are less likely to smoke or drink alcohol and are more likely to take prenatal vitamins.4
 Contraceptive success depends on accommodating the individual patient’s lifestyle. Following are 5 strategies for a user-centric approach to family planning that gives patients more control, more choices, or more flexibility than they might have had previously. 1 Provide forgettable contraception
Contraceptive methods that provide protection against pregnancy with a minimum of maintenance are in the top tier of efficacy, with rates near—or better than—sterilization.5 This group includes the intrauterine contraceptives (IUCs) and the etonogestrel implant. The two IUCs available in the United States, the copper T380A intrauterine device and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, have comparable efficacy rates.6 Counseling about bleeding, pain, and amenorrhea can lower removal rates, and placing the devices during menses lowers the risk of expulsion.
Only 6 pregnancies in 20,648 cycles were reported with the etonogestrel implant.7 Because the FDA requires that any pregnancies within 2 weeks of discontinuation of a contraceptive method be reported in study data, these pregnancies may have occurred after the implant was removed and may provide evidence of a rapid return to fertility after using the etonogestrel implant. The implant works by releasing etonogestrel at levels high enough to inhibit ovulation, which can be reassuring to women who are concerned about the mechanism of action.8
Although not in the top tier of efficacy, the contraceptive patch and monthly vaginal ring also make use easier for patients. Contraceptive users, particularly women age 18 to 19 years, were more likely to comply perfectly with a weekly contraceptive patch than a daily oral contraceptive (OC).9 2 Motivate women
Annual visits and negative pregnancy tests are opportunities to stress the benefits of planning for pregnancy. When discussing any contraceptive method, clinicians can improve acceptance by emphasizing the noncontraceptive benefits of a given method. For example, OCs have been shown to reduce ovarian and endometrial cancer, benign breast disease, pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, iron-deficiency anemia, menorrhagia, and dysmenorrhea.10,11 Additionally, OCs have been associated with reduced incidence of endometriosis and rheumatoid arthritis.10,11 Three OCs have been approved to treat acne and one has been approved for the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Use of OCs can reduce menstrual blood loss, and extended regimens also reduce the frequency of withdrawal bleeding and associated symptoms.
Some women may be reluctant to begin an OC regimen because of side effects they have heard about, such as weight gain, headache, and breast tenderness. The results of one acne study are helpful in counseling such patients.12 During 6 months of therapy, no statistically significant differences were found for any adverse event experienced by pill and placebo users. For example, as shown in the TABLE, 18.4% of women taking OCs got a headache, but 20.5% of placebo users did as well (P = .64).12 Although there certainly are women who are sensitive to hormones, these data show that adverse effects do not usually increase when a new OC regimen is started.
TABLEIncidence of events commonly attributable to OC use
| |
Triphasic Norgestimate/EE (N=228) |
Placebo (N=234) |
P |
| Headache |
42 (18.4) |
48 (20.5) |
.639 |
| Nausea |
29 (12.7) |
21 (9.0) |
.231 |
| Dysmenorrhea |
23 (10.1) |
21 (9.0) |
.752 |
| Breast pain |
21 (9.2) |
11 (4.7) |
.067 |
| Abdominal pain |
13 (5.7) |
9 (3.9) |
.270 |
| Back pain |
13 (5.7) |
8 (3.4) |
.597 |
| Vomiting |
8 (3.5) |
6 (2.6) |
.597 |
| Breast enlargement |
6 (2.6) |
3 (1.3) |
.333 |
| Emotional lability |
6 (2.6) |
1 (0.4) |
.065 |
| Weight gain |
5 (2.2) |
5 (2.1) |
1.000 |
3 Motivate couples
Patients in my public health clinic receive an abundant supply of free condoms, but one-third say they do not use them because they do not like condoms. To overcome this barrier, it may be useful to talk with couples about ways that their method of birth control can enhance sexual pleasure. For example, it was observed in clinical trials that the monthly vaginal ring also increases vaginal lubrication.13
Changes in the way condoms are made and marketed have enhanced their appeal. Condoms now come in a variety of sizes and with a variety of accessories for women, such as refreshing wipes, lubricants, and vibrating rings. Women are reported to purchase about 30% of condoms sold in stores, and some stores have moved condoms into the feminine hygiene section to increase the comfort of female shoppers.14 4 Recognize and reduce real-world barriers
By recognizing the real-world barriers to use of contraceptives, clinicians can make it easier for patients to be successful. One-quarter of patients who leave with an OC prescription or sample do not start the OC because in the intervening time, they became pregnant, changed their mind, got confused about the instructions, or heard about adverse effects from another source.15 One way to address this gap is to use a Quick Start approach (Same Day Start), ie, starting a contraceptive method in the office that day, regardless of where the patient is in her cycle. When a patient begins her pill pack in the office, she is also counseled to use a backup method for the next 7 days. If she has had unprotected intercourse in the previous 5 days, she receives emergency contraception in the office and is told to wait 12 hours and then take the first OC pill. There is no increase in bleeding or spotting with Quick Start, and most women find this to be an acceptable option.15 This approach does increase the number of users who continued the OC into the next cycle, although the continuation rates at 3 and 6 months do not improve.16
Quick Start has also been used for depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injections and the vaginal ring.17,18 At our institution, more than 80% of DMPA shots have been given outside the first 5 days of menses, when there was reasonable certainty that the patient was not pregnant. There have been no significant problems with this approach.17 The monthly vaginal ring provides excellent cycle control with Quick Start.18 By placing the vaginal ring that day in the office, the clinician can answer all the patient’s questions that might have kept a woman from considering ring use, such as how to place and remove the ring and whether it will interfere with intercourse.
Monthly trips to the pharmacy can be a barrier to women’s success; studies have shown that continuation rates improve when clinicians provide prescriptions for more than one cycle at a time.19 With special products, the patient receives 3 months of pills at once. These regimens reduce the frequency of withdrawal bleeds, although unscheduled bleeding and spotting is initially increased with extended regimens. An important counseling point for patients is that such bleeding problems decrease after the first cycle.
The vaginal ring has also been used off-label in an extended regimen.20 There was an increase in unscheduled bleeding with a longer cycle that offset the decrease in scheduled withdrawal bleeds, but for women who can tolerate spotting, this is an option. 5 Anticipate problems
New users of hormonal contraceptive methods need as much education about how to use backup methods, such as condoms, as they do about their primary method of contraception.
Even though emergency contraception is available behind the counter for women age 18 years or older, advance prescriptions for emergency contraception should be provided routinely. This can be an important safety net for patients age 18 or older, because insurance does not cover behind-the-counter emergency contraception, and for younger women requiring prescriptions.
Lastly, it is necessary to explain mechanisms of action based on evidence, not theoretical conjectures. For example despite popular belief, the best scientific evidence has demonstrated that both IUDs and emergency contraception work only to prevent conception.21,22 Summary
Correct use of medication for any asymptomatic condition is low. Clinicians can optimize contraceptive success by determining what patients will use, motivate them with information about noncontraceptive benefits, and provide backup methods. With ever more methods available to clinicians and patients, it is important to stay informed and be flexible as patients’ needs change. 1. Speidel
JJ,
Grossman
RA.
Family planning and access to safe and legal abortion are vital to safeguard the environment. Contraception. 2007;76:415–417.
2. Nettleman
MD,
Chung
H,
Brewer
J, et al. Reasons for unprotected intercourse: analysis of the PRAMS survey. Contraception. 2007;75:361–366.
3. Murphy
PA,
Brixner
D.
Hormonal contraceptive discontinuation patterns according to formulation: Investigation of associations in an administrative claims database. Contraception. 2008;77:257–263.
4. Hellerstedt
WL,
Pirie
PL,
Lando
HA, et al. Differences in preconceptional and prenatal behaviors in women with intended and unintended pregnancies. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:663–666.
5. Family Health International. Comparing effectiveness of family planning methods. http://www.fhi.org/nr/shared/enFHI/Resources/Effectiveness-Chart.pdf. July 2007. Accessed December 9, 2008.
6. French
RS,
Cowan
FM,
Mansour
D, et al. Levonorgestrel-releasing (20 microgram/day) intrauterine systems (Mirena) compared with other methods of reversible contraceptives. BJOG. 2000;107:1218–1225.
7. Association of Reproductive Health Professionals. The single-rod contraceptive implant. July 2008. www.arhp.org/publications-and-resources/clinical-proceedings/Single-Rod/Efficacy. Accessed December 9, 2008.
8. Huber
J,
Wenzl
R.
Pharmacokinetics of Implanon. An integrated analysis. Contraception. 1998;58(suppl 6):85S–90S.
9. Archer
DF,
Cullins
V,
Creasy
GW, et al. The impact of improved compliance with a weekly contraceptive transdermal system (Ortho Evra) on contraceptive efficacy. Contraception. 2004;69:189–195.
10. Ory
HW.
The noncontraceptive health benefits from oral contraceptive use. Fam Plann Perspect. 1982;14:182–184.
11. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Noncontraceptive health benefits of combined oral contraception. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:513–525.
12. Redmond
G,
Godwin
AJ,
Olson
W, et al. Use of placebo controls in an oral contraceptive trial: methodological issues and adverse event incidence. Contraception. 1999;60:81–85.
13. NuvaRing (etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring) [prescribing information], NUV-76926 6/08 00. Roseland NJ: Organon USA Inc. Accessed December 29, 2008.
14. Johnsen
M.
Women are driving condom sales as marketing shifts to pleasure. Drug Store News. August 21, 2001. http://www.drugstorenews.com. Accessed December 9, 2008.
15. Westhoff
C,
Morroni
C,
Kerns
J, et al. Bleeding patterns after immediate vs conventional oral contraceptive initiation: a randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:322–329.
16. Westhoff
C,
Heartwell
S,
Edwards
S, et al. Initiation of oral contraceptives using a quick start compared with a conventional start: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1270–1276.
17. Nelson
AL,
Katz
T.
Initiation and continuation rates seen in 2-year experience with Same Day injections of DMPA. Contraception. 2007;75:84–87.
18. Westhoff
C,
Osborne
LM,
Schafer
JE, et al. Bleeding patterns after immediate initiation of an oral compared with a vaginal hormonal contraceptive. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:89–96.
19. Nelson
AL,
Pietersz
D,
Nelson
LE, et al. Documented short-term continuation rates for combined hormonal contraceptives in an indigent population with ready access to contraceptive supplies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:599:e1–e5.
20. Miller
L,
Verhoeven
CH,
Hout
J.
Extended regimens of the contraceptive vaginal ring: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:473–482.
21. Alvarez
F,
Brache
V,
Fernandez
E, et al. New insights on the mode of action of intrauterine contraceptive devices in women. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:768–773.
22. Novikova
N,
Weisberg
E,
Stanczyk
FZ, et al. Effectiveness of levonorgestrel emergency contraception given before or after ovulation—a pilot study. Contraception. 2007;75:112–118. Sexuality, Reproduction & Menopause ©2009 Lebhar-Friedman, Inc.
|